Best Practices

Two Blues Songs

Transcript

The documents I want to look at today are two blues songs, both the music and the words. My interest in blues is really part of my interest, an interest I began to have about 35 years ago, in how do you give voice, restore voice, to those people who have been rendered voiceless because of the kinds of, well, both because of the kinds of sources we use, but I suppose more importantly, because of the kinds of perspectives historians brought to their study. The perspectives they brought were that the significant actors, both in terms of class and race, geographical location, occupation, were the people who left certain kinds, not all kinds, but certain kinds of written sources behind. And one of the most ubiquitous forms of music after slavery—it has roots in slavery, but it really doesn’t emerge until the turn of the last century—and that is blues. Blues become one of the most common forms of black music, especially in the North, but in the South as well. They’re everywhere. By the early 1900s blues are everywhere. So I began to look at blues.

Written primary sources preserve the history of people who could and chose to read, write, and publish. What about people who didn’t leave a paper trail? Looking at two blues songs from 1939, Lawrence Levine uncovers information about possible aspects of African American culture in the 1930s. He also cautions that, though you can learn a lot from one or two sources, any source needs context to be best understood.

Related Topics

Quick Links →