The Debate in the United States over the League of Nations

Teaser

Documents and audio files explain the range of early political viewpoints on the League of Nations.

lesson_image
Description

Students read and listen to a range of political positions related to the proposed entry of the U.S. into the League of Nations following World War I.

Article Body

This lesson provides a model of how to examine evidence and analyze diverse opinions about a public policy issue. Of particular value is the idea that politicians took a range of positions on the issue of the League, rather than simply being for or against it.

Some nice features of this lesson are that speeches and public testimony are provided both as transcribed texts and as archived audio recordings. In addition, students receive a structured worksheet to record their thinking. These features make the texts more approachable, but many students will still have difficulty with the language and rhetorical style. We, therefore, suggest that classes investigate at least the first few sources as a whole-class activity. Teachers can model how to highlight the key points and focus on revealing passages as the class completes the worksheet.

The recommended assessment activity in which students categorize hypothetical position statements is engaging, but we suggest that students also complete the alternative assessment in which they write about the various political positions they have studied. Writing such an essay encourages students to articulate their own interpretations of the material.

Topic
League of Nations, World War I
Time Estimate
2-3 class sessions
flexibility_scale
4
Rubric_Content_Accurate_Scholarship

Yes Speeches are from the archive of the American Memory project of the Library of Congress.

Rubric_Content_Historical_Background

No Prior knowledge about WWI and the purposes of the League of Nations is required. Numerous links to primary source and background information are provided for teachers and students.

Rubric_Content_Read_Write

Yes

Rubric_Analytical_Construct_Interpretations

Yes The alternative assessment requires students to select and defend a selected position in an essay. Students will need reminders and requirements to use evidence in this essay.

Rubric_Analytical_Close_Reading_Sourcing

Yes Close reading and sourcing constitute the central purpose of this lesson.

Rubric_Scaffolding_Appropriate

Yes Readings and speeches are difficult. Teachers will need to guide student note taking and analysis.

Rubric_Scaffolding_Supports_Historical_Thinking

Yes The worksheet is useful for organizing the data, but not enough space is provided for answers—additional sheets of paper will be needed.

Rubric_Structure_Assessment

Yes The first assessment activity reinforces the concepts of the lesson. The alternative written assignment is better for final assessment. There are no assessment criteria.

Rubric_Structure_Realistic

Yes The directions are clear and comprehensive.

Rubric_Structure_Learning_Goals

No We recommend that the final activity—Discussion of Wilson's Final Campaign—be conducted after the assessment portion of this lesson as it does not clearly fit chronologically or topically with the rest of the lesson.

Opening Up the Textbook: Rosa Parks

Teaser

The textbook is examined as one source among many, rather than a final authority.

lesson_image
Description

Using a textbook passage and two primary sources, this lesson engages students in using historical evidence in order to critique a textbook passage. In this way, it also allows teachers to introduce the textbook as one source among many, rather than the final word on historical events.

Article Body

This easy-to-follow lesson cuts to the heart of historical thinking. Its strength is that it requires students to go to the sources in order to develop historical knowledge. Not only does it show students how public memory and history textbooks can oversimplify complex events, it gives students the means to craft their own textbook passage by drawing on specific textual evidence, including sources that contradict one another.

The simplicity and clarity of the lesson make it ideal for introducing both historical thinking in general and the Civil Rights Movement specifically. More experienced teachers may chafe at the lesson's tight structure—so, they can create their own lesson by using the website's multiple resources regarding the Montgomery Bus Boycott.

Of the two suggested writing assignments, Prompt One, which asks students to rewrite a standard textbook account, is particularly good. Prompt Two asks students to take a position for or against using a standard textbook. While this may prompt students to consider the implications of the traditional Rosa Parks story, it is also problematic. Would it be possible for a student to argue for and still receive a good grade?

Topic
Montgomery Bus Boycott and Civil Rights
Time Estimate
One hour
flexibility_scale
5
Rubric_Content_Accurate_Scholarship

Yes Current historians highlight both Parks's training as an activist and the fact that she was part of a broad, well-organized movement in Montgomery.

Rubric_Content_Historical_Background

No The point of the lesson is to look at students' and textbooks' assumptions about Rosa Parks, and so the lesson purposefully does not offer extra background. However, resources are available at the website.

Rubric_Content_Read_Write

Yes The lesson includes reading one secondary and two primary sources. Teachers can choose from two suggested writing assignments.

Rubric_Analytical_Construct_Interpretations

Yes Students create their own interpretation, and they question a textbook interpretation.

Rubric_Analytical_Close_Reading_Sourcing

Yes Through looking closely at sources, students arrive at a complex understanding of events.

Rubric_Scaffolding_Appropriate

Yes The lesson is appropriate for high school students and with modifications could be used with younger students.

Rubric_Scaffolding_Supports_Historical_Thinking

Yes If analysis stalls, teachers could prod students to look at the documents' dates and to identify the contradictions among the documents.

Rubric_Structure_Assessment

No Assessment strategies are included, but not assessment criteria.

Rubric_Structure_Realistic

Yes

Rubric_Structure_Learning_Goals

Yes The lesson states its goals, and it progresses in a logical, linear fashion.