Civil War and Reconstruction

Description

"This course will examine military aspects of the war, as well as political developments during it, including the political history of the Emancipation Proclamation, the Gettysburg Address and the Second Inaugural. The course also examines the post-war Amendments and the Reconstruction era."

Registration Deadline
Sponsoring Organization
Ashbrook Center, TeachingAmericanHistory.org
Phone number
1 419-289-5411
Target Audience
Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade
Start Date
Cost
None ($500 stipend)
Course Credit
"Teachers may choose to receive two hours of Master's degree credit from Ashland University. This credit can be used toward the new Master of American History and Government offered by Ashland University or may be transfered to another institution. The two credits will cost $440."
Duration
Six days
End Date

Sectionalism and Civil War

Description

"A study of the sectional conflict beginning with the nullification crisis. The course will not only examine the political, social and economic developments in the period leading to the Civil War, but will emphasize the political thought of Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglas, and John C. Calhoun."

Registration Deadline
Sponsoring Organization
Ashbrook Center, TeachingAmericanHistory.org
Phone number
1 419-289-5411
Target Audience
Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade
Start Date
Cost
None ($500 stipend)
Course Credit
"Teachers may choose to receive two hours of Master's degree credit from Ashland University. This credit can be used toward the new Master of American History and Government offered by Ashland University or may be transfered to another institution. The two credits will cost $440."
Duration
Six days
End Date

Lincoln

Description

"Professor Gabor Boritt and guest lecturers examine the 'War President' Abraham Lincoln and the transformation of the United States during and after the Civil War. The seminar focuses on the central role of Gettysburg. Lecture topics include battlefields and soldiers; slavery and race; and Lincoln’s transition to a resolute war leader."

Registration Deadline
Sponsoring Organization
Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
Phone number
1 646-366-9666
Target Audience
Secondary
Start Date
Cost
None ($400 stipend)
Course Credit
"Participants who complete the seminar in a satisfactory manner will receive a certificate. Teachers may use this certificate to receive in-service credit, subject to the policy of their district. No university credit is offered for the course."
Duration
One week
End Date

Abraham Lincoln and the Forging of Modern America

Description

This workshop "will explore Abraham Lincoln’s life in Springfield, Illinois and the political and historical challenges he faced as President. Educators will hear from outstanding Lincoln scholars drawn from universities in the St. Louis area," visit local historical sites important to Lincoln's life, attend pedagogical sessions, complete readings, and create lesson plans. Major themes discussed will be "Lincoln and American Nationalism," "Lincoln and Power," "Lincoln and Freedom," and "Lincoln and Race."

Contact name
Breck, Dr. Susan E.
Contact email
Registration Deadline
Sponsoring Organization
National Endowment for the Humanities
Phone number
1 618-650-3444
Target Audience
Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade
Start Date
Cost
None
Course Credit
"SIUE can provide up to three units of graduate course credit for this workshop" | "SIUE can provide documentation of attendance and participation in this workshop."
Duration
Six days
End Date

Abraham Lincoln and the Forging of Modern America

Description

This workshop "will explore Abraham Lincoln’s life in Springfield, Illinois and the political and historical challenges he faced as President. Educators will hear from outstanding Lincoln scholars drawn from universities in the St. Louis area," visit local historical sites important to Lincoln's life, attend pedagogical sessions, complete readings, and create lesson plans. Major themes discussed will be "Lincoln and American Nationalism," "Lincoln and Power," "Lincoln and Freedom," and "Lincoln and Race."

Contact name
Breck, Dr. Susan E.
Contact email
Registration Deadline
Sponsoring Organization
National Endowment for the Humanities
Phone number
1 618-650-3444
Target Audience
Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade
Start Date
Cost
None
Course Credit
"SIUE can provide up to three units of graduate course credit for this workshop" | "SIUE can provide documentation of attendance and participation in this workshop."
Duration
Six days
End Date

The Legacy of 1808: The Emancipation Proclamation Defined

Description

"Leading American scholars Harold Holzer and Robert F. Engs offer two perspectives on the Emancipation Proclamation, considered the most important document of arguably one of the greatest presidents in U.S. history."

Sponsoring Organization
National Constitution Center
Phone number
1 215-409-6700
Target Audience
General Public
Start Date
Cost
None (reservations required)
Duration
One to two hours

Webquest, Inquiry, and Lincoln’s Views on Technology

Image
Article Body
What Is It?

Webquest is an inquiry model that supports student investigations of web-based materials. Bernie Dodge at San Diego State University developed the strategy in 1995 to help novice learners make good use of web resources (see http://webquest.org).

Rationale

Designed to support inquiry, webquests aim to prompt higher-level thinking among students. The webquest model includes five steps that guide students through the process of locating and analyzing web resources in pursuit of an answer to an organizing question. Students work with multiple sources to answer their question and have to analyze, synthesize, apply, and create. The webquest model also includes assessments that provide students with explicit information about how they will be evaluated.

Description

The webquest process is, on its surface, a very simple system consisting of a five-part structure for guiding students through an inquiry-related activity. Webquests include information in each of five categories:

  • introduction;
  • task description;
  • process for the webquest;
  • description of evaluation; and
  • conclusion

Webquests function as a pedagogical ecosystem of sorts, providing a common language for students and teachers that makes explicit the processes of learning.

Teacher Preparation

To prepare a webquest, teachers must understand the five parts of a webquest. The most important part of a webquest is the task. High quality webquests have an intriguing and clearly focused task or question to prompt inquiry. Much of the work in preparing webquests is locating and vetting web resources and then developing the process for students to engage these resources. Teachers should take great care to locate sources that are developmentally appropriate for their students and are of sufficient complexity to encourage in-depth thinking without leading to confusion or information overload.

In the Classroom

This classroom description provides details on a sample webquest that addresses the question, What can we learn from President Abraham Lincoln about using new technologies to improve our quality of life? Included below for each section of this webquest is:

  • a handout for classroom use; and
  • an explanation for the teacher that describes how this webquest and others might be used in the classroom.

Sample: Introduction: (See Handout 1) President Lincoln’s role as commander in chief during the Civil War defined his presidency. From the beginning of his presidency Lincoln was consumed with the war effort. He took office on March 4, 1861, and just 39 days later Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter in South Carolina. The war did not end until five days before Lincoln’s death in April of 1865. Lincoln was a wartime president for 1,458 of the 1,503 days he was in office, so obviously the war occupied a lot of his time and energy. You probably already knew that Lincoln was president during the Civil War, but might not have known that the war took up 97% of the time he was president. Another thing you might not know about President Lincoln is that he was very interested in new technologies. In fact, Lincoln is the only U.S. president to hold a patent. Lincoln lived at a time when many influential technologies were invented. These new technologies brought big changes for people in the middle of the 19th century, just like new technologies do today. For us, technologies such as the computer and cell phone have improved our quality of life. New technologies in 19th century such as the steam engine and telegraph likewise improved the quality of life for people living back then.

Explanation: The introduction to a webquest should initiate a process and introduce themes, general ideas, and concepts to students. The introduction should grab students’ attention. A good introduction should also situate new ideas in prior knowledge while framing the activity within some well-known ideas. This introduction uses the Civil War as a frame and reminds students that the war lasted for almost the entire Lincoln presidency. The introduction suggests to students that new technologies often improve our quality of life. Students are also introduced to the idea that Lincoln was interested in technology, and was the only president to hold a patent.

Task: (See Handout 2) In this webquest, you will play the role of the current president’s technology advisor. The president has asked you to investigate Lincoln’s historical use of technology to better understand how to make good use of technologies today. You will examine online sources with information about Lincoln’s uses of technology and answer questions about President Lincoln’s use of these technologies. As a final product, you will write a one-page report presenting recommendations for applying the lessons learned from Lincoln to our uses of technologies today. The question guiding your work is: What can we learn from President Abraham Lincoln about using new technologies to improve our quality of life?

Explanation: The task in a webquest is a description of learning activities. Often, tasks are organized around authentic or roleplay activities. Webquests should be question driven and thus should incorporate some element of inquiry or discovery. Good webquests are typically focused on creativity, problem solving, analysis, evaluation, insight, complexity, and/or application. In other words, higher-level, sophisticated student engagement is a hallmark of a good webquest. The task should also include the outcome or form of students’ final product. This webquest requires students to apply knowledge about the past to a current context. Students are expected to investigate specific websites to learn more about Lincoln’s views on new technologies. By playing the role of an advisor to the president, students can work in a simulated context while making an authentic application of what they have learned.

Process: (See Handout 3 for websites and questions) You will need to read materials on the web pages listed below. For each page, you should answer the supporting questions listed below the link to the web page. After you have read materials on all the web pages and answered all the questions, you should prepare your report. Your report should be a minimum of one page (250 words) and should include the following elements.

  1. Your name and the title of your report
  2. A listing of all your sources
  3. A summary of the information in each source. Use the answers to your questions to write your summaries.
  4. Your recommendations for the current president. Remember, you are writing recommendations for the current president. You should include recommendations for promoting and using new technologies to improve our quality of life. You need to explain to the president what we can learn from Abraham Lincoln about new technologies. You can include any historic or current events that you think will be useful in making your recommendations. In sum, your recommendations should be relevant, creative, and reflective of the experiences of President Lincoln.

Explanation: The process step of the webquest model describes the specific activities that students will engage when conducting their webquest. The process must be detailed, sequenced, and well organized. Process in a webquest should look a lot like procedures in a lesson plan, only the process should be written for the students. In the process include:

  • a listing of specific websites or web pages and directions for how students are to use these resources;
  • directions for how the final product should be assembled; and
  • specific directions for completing the final project.

The process for this webquest is focused on students’ readings five web pages and answering 10 questions to support their reading. The web pages vary in length and complexity. The shortest is from Union Pacific Railroad and is less than 350 words. The longest, Lincoln’s 1857 lecture, is almost 3,500 words. Students may not have time or the ability to read all of the text in Lincoln’s address. As an adaptation, this webquest suggests that students read at minimum the first four paragraphs. For this webquest, the final product is a report to the president of the United States making recommendations for promoting and using new technologies.

Description for Evaluation: (See Handout 4 for rubric) Your final product will be evaluated using this rubric. Make sure you read the criteria carefully.

Explanation: Evaluations in the webquest model are designed as rubrics. Each rubric includes criteria for completing the activity, which is listed in the far left column and performance levels along the top row. In each cell are descriptions of the specific measurement of quality related to the given score. The criteria for this webquest include two content items and a writing criterion. You might have more detailed criteria, but will probably want to limit the criteria to five or six total.

Conclusion: (See Handout 4) This webquest focuses on the historical uses of technology by President Abraham Lincoln, with an eye on the present. One of the reasons we study the past is to help us make decisions in the present. Think about how events in the past help us better understand and act in the present. No matter what recommendations you make to the president, remember that the past is only a guide. It is impossible for the past to repeat itself, so our best bet is to make wise use of information about the past given the unique circumstances of the present.

Explanation: The conclusion is a summative statement that ties the webquest project together and provides additional motivation for students to complete the work. In most instances, students will read the conclusion before they complete their work. Sometimes, they may read the conclusion before they begin the work. For this reason, conclusions should not include the “answer” to the webquest. A good conclusion might also include a prompt for students to learn more. In the conclusion to this webquest, students are reminded that history can be used to help us in the present, but we must take care with making these applications.

For more information

For more information about the webquest strategy and collections of webquests please see these resources:

Other related web inquiry and webquest resources:

  • Web Inquiry Projects
  • Margaret M. Thombs, Maureen M. Gillis, and Alan S. Canestrari, Using WebQuests in the Social Studies Classroom: A Culturally Responsive Approach (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2008)

For additional webquests about President Abraham Lincoln visit Questgarden. Click search and enter Lincoln. Here are a few specific examples.

For more on Lincoln’s uses of technology:

  • Lincoln Telegrams
  • Robert V. Bruce, Lincoln and the Tools of War (Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, 1989) (for an excerpt, click here)
  • Jason Emerson, Lincoln the Inventor (Carbondale, IL: SIU, 2009)
  • Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858

    Image
    Annotation

    The Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 website covers precisely what it sounds as if it would—the famed debates between senatorial candidates Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas.

    Navigation is simple, divided into sections by primary source type. Debate Text from Nicolay and Hay< includes "transcriptions" of the debates recreated by two of Lincoln's secretaries circa 1894, as well as debate-related publications by the same two individuals. The transcriptions are based on Lincoln's own writings and newspaper accounts of the debates. Debate Text from Newspapers provides links to newspaper versions of the debate. The website notes that newspapers were affiliated with a political party, and that it can be intriguing to compare Democratic and Republican accounts of the same speech. Debate Commentary from Newspapers is similar to the newspaper debate text section except that it covers period observations on the debates rather than the words spoken.

    Additional sections contain video commentary on the debates, maps, relevant images, and two lesson plans. Note that the lesson plans do not specify appropriate grade levels.

    Black Confederates

    field_image
    Question

    To what extent did African Americans, slave or free, fight for the Confederacy?

    Answer

    While there are isolated instances of African Americans serving in the Confederate ranks, there is overwhelming evidence that this small number represents rare and exceptional cases: historian David Blight estimates that the number of black soldiers in the Confederate ranks was fewer than 200. That small number represents some partial companies of slaves training as soldiers discovered by Union forces after the fall of Richmond. One reason that only a handful of blacks fought for the Confederacy is that until the last weeks of the war, the Confederate Congress expressly forbade arming enslaved African Americans, who made up the vast majority of the black population in the South. Given white southerners' longstanding fears of a slave uprising (fears intensified by a few abortive attempts in the first half of the 19th century and exacerbated to the point of hysteria by John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry in 1859), the acute resistance of Confederates to arming blacks is understandable. Putting muskets in the hands of enslaved African Americans presented more than simply a concrete threat—embracing the notion that blacks could serve as soldiers in the same fashion as whites threatened deeply-held Southern ideas of race-based honor and masculinity. As Confederate Secretary of State Robert Toombs put it, "The day the army of Virginia allows a negro regiment to enter their lines as soldiers, they will be degraded, ruined, and disgraced."

    Opposition to African American soldiers was passionate on both sides. The notion of fighting alongside blacks violated many deeply-held beliefs of white Northerners and Southerners alike.

    Northerners were scarcely more enthusiastic about arming African Americans than their Southern counterparts. For the first year and a half of the war, Abraham Lincoln's administration eschewed the enlistment of black troops, fearful of a public backlash. Not until Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, did the Union Army begin to enroll African Americans in its ranks; even then, the decision proved deeply controversial, particularly among Northern Democrats. The Confederacy did not seriously entertain the idea of arming enslaved African Americans until a full year later, when the war situation in the South had grown much more desperate. In January 1864, months after the defeats at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, Patrick Cleburne (one of the most successful combat commanders in the Confederate Army) circulated a proposal to arm the slaves. Northern successes on the battlefield, Cleburne argued, threatened the South with "the loss of all we now hold most sacred—slaves and all other personal property, lands, homesteads, liberty, justice, safety, pride, manhood." Sacrificing the first, Cleburne held, could save the rest; the Confederacy could check Union advances by recruiting an army of slaves and guaranteeing freedom "within a reasonable time to every slave in the South who shall remain true to the Confederacy." A dozen of Cleburne's subordinates backed his proposal.

    Lee wrote a letter to a Confederate congressman characterizing the plan as "not only expedient but necessary."

    To most Southerners, however, Cleburne's plan was appalling. The prospect of arming the slaves struck one division commander as "revolting to Southern sentiment, Southern pride, and Southern honor." A brigade commander suggested that accepting enslaved African Americans as soldiers would "contravene the principles upon which we fight." Sensing the potential for the debate to cause dangerous dissension within the ranks, Confederate President Jefferson Davis ordered the generals to cease the discussion. Debate over the decision to arm enslaved African Americans resurfaced many months later, as the Confederacy's situation grew progressively more dire both on and off the battlefield. When another similar proposal reemerged it carried the imprimatur of Robert E. Lee, commander of the Army of Northern Virginia and perhaps the most revered figure in the South. In February 1865, Lee wrote a letter to a Confederate congressman characterizing the plan as "not only expedient but necessary." Even with Lee's support, though, the bill proved deeply divisive. It was not until March 13, 1865, just weeks before Lee's surrender, that the Confederate Congress passed legislation allowing for the enlistment of black soldiers. The two companies discovered by Union troops after the fall of Richmond never went into battle. Opposition to African American soldiers was passionate on both sides. The notion of fighting alongside blacks violated many deeply-held beliefs of white Northerners and Southerners alike. In the Union army, African Americans served in segregated regiments under white officers; many were used for menial tasks rather than fighting, and those that went into combat suffered abuse from their white comrades and were often singled out as targets by their Confederate foes. Nevertheless, the vast majority of African American troops fought bravely and with distinction, and by the end of the war, their actions in combat had begun to change the assumptions of at least some of their comrades regarding the fitness of blacks for battle. Despite their demonstrated fighting ability, it was nearly another full century before the United States Army finally desegregated individual units.

    Bibliography

    Blight, David. A Slave No More. United States: Harcourt Books, 2007. Freedmen & Southern Society Project. "Confederate Law Authorizing the Enlistment of Black Soldiers, as Promulgated in a Military Order." The Making of America."The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies." Washington, 1880-1901. Series 4. Vol. 3. Levine, Bruce. Confederate Emancipation: Southern Plans to Free and Arm Slaves during the Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.