Teaching Materials
Ask a Master Teacher
Lesson Plan Gateway
Lesson Plan Reviews
State Standards
Teaching Guides
Digital Classroom
Ask a Digital Historian
Tech for Teachers
Beyond the Chalkboard
History Content
Ask a Historian
Beyond the Textbook
History Content Gateway
History in Multimedia
Museums and Historic Sites
National Resources
Quiz
Website Reviews
Issues and Research
Report on the State of History Education
Research Briefs
Roundtables
Best Practices
Examples of Historical Thinking
Teaching in Action
Teaching with Textbooks
Using Primary Sources
TAH Projects
Lessons Learned
Project Directors Conference
Project Spotlight
TAH Projects
About
Staff
Partners
Technical Working Group
Research Advisors
Teacher Representatives
Privacy
Quiz Rules
Blog
Outreach
Teaching History.org logo and contact info

Multiperspectivity: What Is It, and Why Use It?

Photo, San Francisco, Calif., April 1942. . . , Library of Congress
Question 

What is multiperspectivity in history?

Answer 

Exploring multiple perspectives (which is known as "multiperspectivity" in parts of Europe) requires incorporating source materials that reflect different views of a historical event. In recent decades scholars and educators have begun to question the validity of singular (one-sided) historical narratives. Instead of just focusing on dominant groups and communities, they recommend employing multiple perspectives. One reason for this stems from increasing diversity and cultural pluralism, since many groups—women, the poor, ethnic minorities, etc.—have been ignored in traditional historical narratives.

. . . many groups—women, the poor, ethnic minorities, etc.—have been ignored in traditional historical narratives.

Another reason is disciplinary. After all, good historians don’t just settle for one perspective on a historical issue—they piece together many (sometimes competing) versions of a story to construct an accurate interpretation. As Ann Low-Beer explains, "In history, multiple perspectives are usual and have to be tested against evidence, and accounted for in judgments and conclusions."

Here's an instance of using multiple perspectives: When studying the voyages of discovery, students would not only learn about explorers like Columbus, but about the peoples who had been "discovered." Historian Jon Wiener, writing in American History 101 in Slate magazine, offers the following example:

In the case of Reconstruction. . . I focus [on] the three most significant [perspectives]: the Northern Radicals, who shaped federal policy and who wanted to bring the former slaves into the economy of the free market, as wage earners, and into the political system, as voters; the Southern planter elite, who wanted to preserve as much of the old plantation labor system as possible; and the former slaves themselves. Their understanding of freedom was, as Eric Foner has written, "shaped by their experiences as slaves." Freedom for them meant freedom to work for themselves—economic autonomy and access to land. This argument shows the freedmen defining their own interests, in conflict with the federal government, which claimed to represent them. Thus, instead of giving students a list of facts and dates to memorize, I would ask them to conceive of what's happening as a three-sided conflict over the meaning of freedom.

. . . instead of giving students a list of facts and dates to memorize, I would ask them to conceive of what's happening as a three-sided conflict over the meaning of freedom.

Consequently, for Wiener, "students end up learning not just about what happened during Reconstruction, but about how history itself gets reconstructed."

If not yet universal, this approach is widely accepted. In its most recent Position Statement, the National Council for the Social Studies in the United States recommended students learn to "think critically, and make personal and civic decisions based on information from multiple perspectives."

So what can a classroom teacher do? Try incorporating primary sources that represent a range of views on a historical issue. Then, ask students to spend some time thinking about why different groups may see the same event in different ways. Oftentimes a different story emerges when those multiple perspectives are put together. The result is enriched historical understanding.

as a retired teacher the

as a retired teacher the major issue facing eduators when presenting conflicting primary sources, cartoons, photos etc on an issue is being able to compile these resources. Primary documents cannot be longer then 8-10 lines to maintain student interest. Where can an educator obtain this type of material?

I belive that E.Fenton published a book Perspectives in History and in that book several issues/problems were presented but each source was about 1000 words--students could not fathom through this material--thus this pedagogical approach disapeared. What educators need is the AP history document question format where primary sources presented are succinct and short.

rob sandhu
vancouver,b.c

You make a good

You make a good point--Fenton's stuff was great, but for several reasons it didn't get implemented as widely or have the staying power that it deserved.

There are several resources at teachinghistory.org that can help you manage the difficulty and length of primary documents so you can use them with students at all reading and grade levels. First, see other answers in the Ask a Master Teacher feature regarding literacy and primary sources at http://teachinghistory.org/teaching-materials/ask-a-master-teacher/categ....

Also see the guide on preparing and adapting primary sources at http://teachinghistory.org/teaching-materials/teaching-guides/23560. Browse Using Primary Sources on the Best Practices page to find more help.

I sometimes wonder what

I sometimes wonder what influence the internet has on helping people reach multiperspectivity regarding history. For a student with an open mind, even if they aren't getting this information from a school text or teacher, discovering the different perspectives on history is something they can do on their own to a better degree than say 20-30 years ago.

Furthermore, the world is a much smaller place and it seems like there are more study abroad or volunteer opportunities for students. This sort of immersion allows students to see history in a context that may differ from what they previously learned.

All in all, I think multiperspectivity is very important. History will always be filled with a tinge of the unknown, but the more cross referencing of sources, the more apt we are to understand the true accounts of our past and where we might be headed in the future.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <b> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 
Content