At a Glance
Teacher Review
Topics
Website
Features
Duration
Grade(s)
Lesson Format
Download
Roads to Antietam
Review
With so many topics to teach and so little time, many teachers find it difficult to cover military history. This lesson on the Battle of Antietam provides an excellent opportunity to both teach military history and promote historical thinking skills.
Students will hone these skills as they analyze two documents written by General Lee on the eve of the Battle of Antietam. The first document, Lee’s 1862 Proclamation to the people of Maryland, sheds light on Lee’s motivations for invading Maryland. The second document, Special Orders #191, is Lee’s marching orders that were famously intercepted by the Union Army before the battle. Focus questions that support close reading and historical thinking accompany each of these documents.
After analyzing the documents, students work in groups to create a battle plan that could be used by the Union Army to counter Lee’s plans as revealed in Special Orders #191. Each group draws their battle plan on a laminated map, and presents it to the class. This portion of the lesson is creative and interactive, but teachers are not provided with clear information about what would be an effective, historically accurate battle plan. Teachers may want to devise clear criteria for students to consider when developing the battle plan to prevent this from devolving into an ahistorical activity in which students draw up unrealistic or anachronistic plans. Alternatively, teachers and students could generate criteria together as they review the groups’ plans, but teachers will still want to be prepared to guide students in judging these plans in reasonable ways.
For homework, the lesson specifies that students are to research the battle tactics used by General McClellan to counter Lee’s plans at Antietam. This has potential to be a very useful assignment; but again, teachers will need to be attentive to the criteria students use for evaluating McClellan’s tactics.
Notes
Field | Criteria | Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Historical Content | Is historically accurate? | Yes |
||
Includes historical background? | No |
|||
Requires students to read and write? | No |
|||
Analytic Thinking | Requires students to analyze or construct interpretations using evidence? | Yes |
||
Requires close reading and attention to source information? | Yes |
|||
Scaffolding | Is appropriate for stated audience? | Yes |
||
Includes materials and strategies for scaffolding and supporting student thinking? | Yes |
|||
Lesson Structure | Includes assessment criteria and strategies that focus on historical understanding? | No |
||
Defines clear learning goals and progresses logically? | Yes |
|||
Includes clear directions and is realistic in normal classroom settings? | Yes |